Disposed
Sant Ram v. Sandeep Kumar and Another
Himachal Pradesh HCCOPC/216/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 216 of 2023
Decided on: 03.08.2023
Sant Ram .…Petitioner. Versus Sandeep Kumar and Anr. …Respondents. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record instructions, according to which order passed by this Court has been complied with. This factual position has not been controverted on behalf of the petitioner.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
required to be passed in this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 3rd August, 2023 Judge (sushma)
Sant Ram
Sandeep Kumar
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court