Petitioner submitted that a prior order rendered the current writ petition infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 4640 of 2021 Date of Decision: 21.12.2022
_____________________________________________________________________ Shekhar Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of HP and Ors.
……...Petitioner Versus …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Parv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Additional Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of order passed in CWPOA No. 6997 of 2020 on 21.12.2022, present petition has become infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of accordingly.
December 21, 2022 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge
Shekhar Sharma
State of HP
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
