Poonam Rana v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Connected CPCMs were disposed of because a prior judgment held a National Council for Teacher Education notification non-binding, leaving no survival for adjudication.
Connected CPCMs were disposed of because a prior judgment held a National Council for Teacher Education notification non-binding, leaving no survival for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 842 of 2022 along with connected matters
Decided on: 6th December, 2022
| CWP No. | 842 of 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chint Ram and others | Versus | .......Petitioners |
| State of H.P and others | ...Respondents | |
| CWP No. | 963 of 2022 | |
| Akarsh Sharma and others | Versus | .......Petitioners |
| State of H.P and another | ...Respondents | |
| CWP No. | 1278 of 2022 | |
| Pradeep Kumar | Versus | .......Petitioner |
| State of H.P and others | ...Respondents | |
| CWP No. | 1560 of 2022 | |
| Poonam Rana | Versus | .......Petitioner |
| State of H.P and others Coram |
...Respondents |
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
For the petitioner(s): M/s Devender K. Sharma, Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisth and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates
For the respondents:
Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr. Addl. A.G with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy. A.G for the respondent-State.
Ms. Suchitra Sen and Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocates for the respondent-HPSSB in the respective petitions.
Mr. B.Nandan Vashist, Advocate for the respondent-NCTE.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. (Oral)
On 30.08.2022, this Court had passed the following
orders:-
“The fate of this case is dependent upon CWP No. 1773 of 2022 in which case, the judgment had already been reserved. Therefore, put up after the decision in CWP No. 1773 of 2020.”
3
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge December 06, 2022 ( Virender Singh ) (naveen) Judge
Chint Ram and others
Akarsh Sharma and others
Pradeep Kumar
Poonam Rana
State of H.P
HPSSB
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court