Criminal Misc. Petition dismissing plea for regular bail under NDPS Act where petitioner possessed approx. 4.6kg of Cheras. Court refused bail as prosecution evidence remains incomplete with only five witnesses examined.
Petition for grant of regular bail dismissed; petitioner denied enlargement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 4th DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (MAIN) No. 268 of 2022
Between:-
SH. LED RAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O SH. MASUKH, R/O VILLAGE BASHLALA, P.O. KHUNACHI, TEHSIL THUNAG, DISTT. MANDI, H.P. THROUGH HIS SON AND NEXT FRIEND SH. SATISH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.
...PETITIONER
(BY SH. S. K. BANYAL, ADVOCATE) AND
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
...RESPONDENTS
(SH. ASHOK SHARMA, A.G. WITH SH. RAJINDER DOGRA, SR. ADDL. A.G., SH. VINOD THAKUR, ADDL. A.G. AND SH. RAJAT CHAUHAN, LAW OFFICER)
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the following:-
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this application for grant of
regular bail.
2
enlarge the petitioner on bail.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail given his possession of a commercial quantity of Cheras.
Whether the stage of recording of prosecution evidence justifies enlargement on bail.
Sh. Led Ram
State of Himachal Pradesh
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
