The petitioner withdrew the contempt petition as the challenged order had been complied with. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed and discharged the notice.
Contempt petition disposed as not pressed; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 4th DAY OF MARCH, 2022.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
CIVIL ORIGINAL PETITION CONTEMPT No.28 of 2022.
Between:-
SH. ASHOK KUMAR-1 S/O SH. RAM LAL, R/O VILLAGE KOT, P.O. KALLAR, TEHSIL SADAR, DISTT. BILASPUR, H.P.
.…..PETITIONER.
(BY SH. V.D. KHIDTTA, ADVOCATE)
AND
SH. SANDEEP KUMAR, PRESENTLY WORKING AS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HRTC, SHIMLA-171001.
…….RESPONDENT/CONTEMNOR.
(BY MS. SHUBH MAHAJAN, ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission after notice this day, the Court passed the following:
O R D E R
Since the order in question has been complied with, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant contempt petition at this stage.
2
of as not pressed, so also the pending application, if any. Notice is discharged.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
4th March, 2022. (krt)
Sh. Ashok Kumar
Sh. Sandeep Kumar
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
