The High Court granted leave to the State to file an appeal against a judgment of acquittal pronounced by the Trial Court in a criminal matter.
Leave to appeal granted to the State/Appellant to file appeal against the judgment in issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
State vs. Ajay Kumar
Cr.MP(M) No. 1254 of 2021
05.08.2022 Present: M/s Sumesh Raj, Dinesh Thakur and Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Manoj Bagga, Asstt. AG, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel for the non-applicant/respondent.
Cr.MP(M) No. 1254 of 2022
By way of this application, a prayer has been made by the applicant/appellant, seeking leave of the Court to prefer an appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by learned Trial Court. Reply to the application stands filed. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and having perused the averments made in the application as well as reply, as there are arguable points in the appeal, accordingly, this application is allowed and leave to appeal is granted to the applicant/State to file appeal against the judgment in issue.
Cr. Appeal No. ____ of 2022
Be registered.
Admit.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, learned Legal Aid Counsel, accepts notice post admission on behalf of the respondent/accused.
Record be called for.
List in due course.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 05, 2022 (narender)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against a judgment of acquittal.
State
Ajay Kumar
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
