In COMPS No. 734 of 2022, the Court allowed an application for condonation of 65 days delay in filing an appeal, finding the delay was bonafide. The case involves further proceedings in supplementary and cognakinse formats.
Condonation of 65 days delay in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rameshwar Shah Vs. N.K. Mahindroo
CMP(M) No. 734 of 2022
05.08.2022 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/ appellant.
CMP(M) No. 734 of 2022
Non-applicant/respondent stands served. As none is appearing for the non-applicant/respondent despite service, therefore, said non-applicant/respondent is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte .
By way of this application, a prayer has been made for condonation of 65 days delay in filing the appeal.
Having heard learned Counsel for the applicant and having perused the averments made in the application, as the Court is satisfied that delay in filing the appeal is bonafide and not intentional, accordingly, this application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
RSA No. ____ of 2022
Be registered.
Notice to the respondent, returnable for 14.10.2022. Steps for service be taken within one week.
List on 14.10.2022.
CMPST No. 13169 of 2022
Notice in above terms.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
August 05, 2022
(narender)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the 65 days delay in filing the appeal is bonafide and warrants condonation.
Whether the respondent appearing in CMP(M) No. 734 of 2022 is to be proceeded against ex parte.
Rameshwar Shah
N.K. Mahindroo
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
