The court disposed of the petition following the respondents' submission that the inquiry was concluded within the stipulated timeline as per a previous direction.
Petition dismissed; pending applications disposed of; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 379 of 2022 Date of decision : 6.12.2022. Munish Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Onkar Chand Sharma & another ...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. H.R. Sighu, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Narender Thakur, Dy. A.G.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
The direction issued by the Principal Division Bench of this Court to the respondents vide judgment dated 23.6.2022 was to conclude the inquiry after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within four weeks from the receipt of copy of the judgment.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
this, nothing survives in the petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Notice discharged.
(Satyen Vaidya) 6th December, 2022 Judge (kck)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survives in light of the concluded inquiry and compliance with the previous direction?
Munish Kumar
Onkar Chand Sharma
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
