The court held that the earlier order was fully complied with, deemed no further proceedings necessary, and disposed of the petition without notice.
Petition disposed of; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
| COPC No. 76 of 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Date of decision : 5.12.2022. | |
| Kishori Lal | ...Petitioner. |
| Versus | |
| Sandeep Kumar | ...Respondent |
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ajeet Singh Saklani, Advocate
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
The order passed by this Court has been fully complied with. In view of this, no further proceedings are required in the present petition, hence the petition is accordingly disposed of. Notice discharged.
(Satyen Vaidya) 5th December, 2022 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Kishori Lal
Sandeep Kumar
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
