Disposed
Union of India v. Roshan Lal and Ors.
Himachal Pradesh HCCMP.M/1001/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
and Anr. vs. Roshan Lal & ors. CMP(M) No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
and Anr. vs. Roshan Lal & ors. CMP(M) No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Union of India and Anr. vs. Roshan Lal & ors.
CMP(M) No. 1001 of 2022.
01.08.2022 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the petitioners.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No.1001 of 2022
By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicants/petitioners for condonation of delay in filing the accompanying petition.
Learned counsel representing the non-
applicants/respondents fairly states that he does not intend to file any reply to the application and shall have no objection, in case prayer made in the application is allowed.
Having heard learned counsel representing the parties and perused the material available on record, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of the lengthy administrative process and as such, delay in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Civil Revision No._________2022
Be registered.
Admit.
Notice. Mr. Maan Singh, learned Advocate, appears and
waives post admission notice on behalf of the respondents.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, record of
learned court below be called for.
CMP No.________2022
Be registered.
Subject to the applicants/petitioners depositing the additional amount of compensation, within a period of eight weeks from today, operation and execution of impugned orders dated 12.03.2018 & 13.06.2018 (Annexure P-4), passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kullu in Ex. Pet. No.64/2016, titled Roshan Lal & Ors vs. Collector Land Acquisition and another , shall remain stayed.
Application stands disposed of.
Copy dasti.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
1st August, 2022 (reena)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Union of India and Anr.
Roshan Lal & ors.
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court