Petition rendered infructuous as reliefs sought were already granted per filed reply. Petition and pending applications disposed; parties bear own costs.
Petition and pending applications disposed; each party bears own costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 133/2020 Decided on : 6.7.2021
Dhale Ram & anr. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar God, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs.
(Video Conferencing)
_____________________________________________________________________ Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the reliefs, as sought, have been granted in their favour, as is evident from the reply filed in this case. His statement is taken on record.
2 Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, it is made clear that in case any
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
subsisting grievance(s)/further grievance(s) still survives, they are
always at liberty to avail such remedy.
3 Parties are left to bear their own costs.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya)
6.7.2021
Judge
(pankaj)
Dhale Ram & anr.
State of H.P. & ors.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
