Suman Kumar v. Hp Public Service Commission
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No.…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 117 of 2020 Date of decision: 06.07.2021.
Suman Kumar …..Petitioner. Versus H. P. Public Service Commission & Ors. …..Respondents.
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G., with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy. A.G., for respondents No. 2 and 3.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous with the afflux of time. His statement is taken on record.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) 6th July, 2021 Judge (sanjeev)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
Suman Kumar
H. P. Public Service Commission
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court