The High Court, without adverting to merits, directed Respondent No.3 to treat the petitioner's writ petition as a representation and dispose of it within six weeks.
Direction to respondent No.3 to treat the petition as a representation and decide it within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 8th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA
&
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7742 of 2021
Between:-
M/S HAR HAR MINERALS & CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MRS. HARVINDER KAUR, W/O SH. CHANDER JOT SINGH, R/O HOUSE NO.44, WARD NO.6, PAONTA SAHIB, TEHSIL PAONTA, DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P. 173025. ..….PETITIONER
(BY MS. SEEMA AZAD, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (INDUSTRIES), TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171002.
2. THE DIRECTORATE INDUSTRIES
3. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110003.
4. STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
5. GENERAL MANAGER DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, NAHAN, DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P. …...RESPONDENTS
2
(MR. AJAY VAIDYA, SENIOR ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL, FOR THE RESPONDENTSSTATE.
MR. BALRAM SHARMA, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, FOR THE RESPONDENTSUNION OF INDIA)
This Civil Writ Petition coming on for admission this day, Hon’ble
Ms. Justice Sabina, passed the following:
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking mainly the following relief:-
3
parameters of Article 13(3) (a) of the Constitution of India, as the said letter does not fall within the definition of law, ergo, the impugned letter dated 08.11.2010, deserves to be quashed and set aside.”
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
Copy Dasti.
( Sabina ) Judge
December 8, 2021 (ks)
( Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Har Har Minerals & Chemical Industries
State of Himachal Pradesh
Union of India
Sabina
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
