The single judge of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, granting liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1120 of 2021 Date of Decision: 7.7.2021
____________ ________________________________________________ Subhas Kayastha …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …..Respondent. ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Additional Advocate General. Through video-conferencing
____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Having carefully perused the status report filed
on behalf of the respondent-State, learned counsel representing the bail petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if required and desired.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
Subhas Kayastha
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
