Two civil revision petitions arising from the same dispute founders on a settlement reached by the parties during pendency. The court allowed the withdrawal of petitions and vacated interim directions.
Petitions disposed of as withdrawn along with all pending applications; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Civil Revisions Nos. 57-58 of 2018 Decided on: July 6, 2021
____________ ___________________________________________________ 1. Civil Revision No. 57 of 2018 Inder Pal ………..Petitioner Versus Mittar Sain and others ….Respondents 2. Civil Revision No. 58 of 2018 Inder Pal ………..Petitioner Versus Mittar Sain and others ….Respondents
_______________________________________________________________ Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
None for remaining respondents.
THROUGH VIDEO-CONFERENCING
_______________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner(s), on
instructions, states that during the pendency of the present petitions, parties have resolved to settle the dispute amicably inter se them and as such, she has instructions to withdraw the petitions.
for the petitioner(s), present petitions are disposed of as
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
withdrawn, alongwith all pending applications, if any. Interim directions, if any, also stand vacated. Record, if received, be sent
back forthwith.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
July 6, 2021 (vikrant)
Inder Pal
Mittar Sain
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
