The Court disposed of the writ petition, directing respondents to decide on Annexure P-1 within six weeks, after providing a personal hearing opportunity to the petitioner. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Direction to respondents to decide on Annexure P-1 within six weeks after personal hearing to petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.4186 of 2020. Date of Decision: 5th October, 2020.
Ramesh Kumar Negi …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. ……Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Virender Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. AG with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Dy. AG.
(Through Video Conferencing)
Sureshwar Thakur, Judge (oral).
Heard. The extant writ petition is disposed of, with, a
direction to the respondents concerned, to, within six weeks from today, make a decision on Annexure P-1, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the writ petitioner. All
pending applications stand disposed of.
(Sureshwar Thakur) Judge (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) 5th October, 2020. Judge (raman/CS)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should be directed to decide on the petitioner's request (Annexure P-1) after personal hearing within six weeks?
Ramesh Kumar Negi
State of H.P. and Ors.
Sureshwar Thakur
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
