Petition held infructuous due to absence of FIR; dismissed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 2067 of 2019 Decided on: 09.12.2019
______________________________________________________________ Satish Kumar Seth
Union of India
....Petitioner Versus .…Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Government Standing Counsel. Sh. Raj Singh, Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
Learned Central Government Standing Counsel for
the respondent-Union of India, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, states that no FIR has been registered against the petitioner.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) December 09, 2019 Judge (raman)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Satish Kumar Seth
Union of India
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
