Petitioner sought to withdraw an infructuous criminal miscellaneous petition, which the court dismissed.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Cr.MMO No.287 of 2019 Decided on: 12.12.2019
| _______________________________________________ Amit Chauhan Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. |
________ …… ……….R |
___________ …..Petitioner espondents |
|---|---|---|
| ________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 |
_________ | _________ |
| For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, |
Advocate | . |
| For the Respondent : Mr. Sudhir Bhatna and Mr. Arvind Advocate Gener Thakur, Deputy Ad |
gar, Mr. Sharma, als, with vocate G |
Anil Jaswal Additional Mr. Kunal eneral. |
| __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): |
|---|
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that
present petition has rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the same.
2. Consequently, in view of the aforesaid, present petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
12th December, 2019 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Amit Chauhan
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
Manjit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
