Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Civil Revision No. 128 of 2019. Permission granted, and the revision dismissed as withdrawn along with any pending applications.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Civil Revision No. 128 of 2019 Decided on : 05.11.2019
| __________________________ Jung Bahadur Singh Bawa |
____________ | _____________ …..Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Versus Anju Sharma & another |
…Respondents | |
| ___________________________ Coram: |
____________ | _____________ |
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep S Whether approved for reporting? |
harma, Judge. |
|
| For the Petitioner : | Mr. G.S. Rat | hore, Advocate. |
| For the Respondents: | Mr. Hari Advocate. |
Shyam Upadhayay, |
| _________________________ _ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral) |
____________ | _____________ |
After arguing for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this Civil Revision. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn,
alongwith pending application(s), if any.
November 5, 2019. (Sandeep Sharma) (hemlata) Judge
2
2
Jung Bahadur Singh Bawa
Anju Sharma
another
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
