Partly allowed
Harinder v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCRMPM/1861/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M)…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1861 of 2019
Date of Decision: 4th November, 2019
____________ ________________________________________ Harinder …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …..Respondent.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Proxy counsel. For the respondent: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar and Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Kunal Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Sequel to order dated 15.10.2019, ASI Vidya Sagar
has come present alongwith the record. Mr. Kunal Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, has also placed on record status report, prepared on the basis of the investigation carried out by the Investigating Agency.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage,
in accordance with law, if required and desired.
been made by learned counsel representing the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to
the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
4th November, 2019
(shankar)
Harinder
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court