The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the withdrawal of the appeal and dismissed it. The appellant stated that the grievance was redressed per a compliance report by the Executive Engineer, hence they did not insist on pressing the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RSA No. 74 of 2017 Decided on: 28.11.2017
Sh. Tilak Raj & others …Appellants Versus Sh. Udham Singh ... Respondent Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No
For the Appellants: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellants on instructions from his
client states that in view of the compliance report submitted by the Executive Engineer, IPH Dehra, dated 14.11.2017, the grievance of the appellants stands redressed. In view of this, he does not want to press the present appeal. His statement is taken on record.
November 28, 2017
sanjeev
Tilak Raj & others
Udham Singh
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
