Dismissed
Bhola Ram v. Kaula Ram
Himachal Pradesh HCRSA/629/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RSA No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RSA No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 629 of 2005 Decided on: 05.07.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
__________________________________________________________ Bhola Ram …..Appellant Versus Kaula Ram & another ……Respondents
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No
For the appellant: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Basant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
Steps for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased respondent No. 1 not taken. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2 states that as there is same cause of action against both the respondents, the appeal is also not maintainable against respondent No. 2 and stands abated as a whole. The proposition, so raised, is not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 5th July, 2017 (raman)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?yes
Bhola Ram
Kaula Ram
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court