The appeal was abated and dismissed because the appellant died before appearing; no representation was filed on his behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
FAO No. 574 of 2008 Decided on: 05.07.2017
D.S. Mankotia …..Appellant Versus Surinder Kumar Sharma & another ……Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No
For the appellant: None.
For the respondents: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. None for respondent No. 2. _________________________________________________________________ Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
Notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report that the appellant has died. Since no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant, in view of this, the appeal stands abated. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, as abated. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 5th July, 2017 (raman)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?yes
D.S. Mankotia
Surinder Kumar Sharma
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
