The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed an appeal by Pirthi representatives as withdrawn since the respondent applied for partition, directing parties to bear own costs and disposing pending applications.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; parties to bear own costs; pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
R.S.A. No. 455 of 2004.
Decided on : 21.9.2017
Prem Singh (deceased) through his LRs …Appellants. Versus Abnash Chander Mehra …Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Appellants : Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. B.C Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. Sh. Virender Singh, appellant 1(b), present in person.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)
On instructions from Sh. Virender Singh, appellant No.1(b), Mr. B.C. Verma, learned counsel for the appellants states that since the respondent has already applied for partition, the appellants do not intend to press the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Pending application(s) if any, also stands disposed of.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) September 21, 2017. Judge (GR)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?
Prem Singh (deceased) through his LRs
Abnash Chander Mehra
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
