Judhia v. Ramesh Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2008 13.07.2017 Present: Mr. J.L.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 165 of 2008
13.07.2017
Present: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate vice counsel for respondents No. 1 to 4.
None for respondents No. 5 to 11, 13 to 17, 19 and 21 to 26.
Consequential steps on the death of
respondents No. 12, 18 and 20 have not been taken. Therefore, in view of the order passed on the previous date, wrongly listed.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary) Judge
July 13, 2017 (naveen)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
unnamed appellant
- respondent
unnamed respondent No. 1
- respondent
unnamed respondent No. 2
- respondent
unnamed respondent No. 3
- respondent
unnamed respondent No. 4
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/165/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court