The court allowed an application to condone a one-day delay in filing the main appeal, finding the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate. The matter was disposed of.
The application for condonation of delay in filing the main appeal is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No._______of 2017
24.05.2017 Present: Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate for the appellants/applicants.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate for the respondents.
CMP(M) No. 29 of 2017
Heard. Having gone through the contents
and the reasons stated in the application, the delay of one day, as occurred in filing the main appeal seems to be neither intentional nor deliberate and rather stands duly explained. Being so, this application is allowed and the delay, as occurred in filing the main appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No. of 2017
Copy of grounds of appeal, complete in all respect, be supplied to learned counsel for the respondents during the course of the day. Send for the records. List on 12th July, 2017.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary) Judge
May 24, 2017 (naveen)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the one-day delay in filing the main appeal was deliberate or intentional and required condonation.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
