Dismissed
Jaram Chand v. Karam Singh
Himachal Pradesh HCRSA/138/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2005 14.06.2017 Present: None for the…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2005 14.06.2017 Present: None for the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.06.2017
RSA No. 138 of 2005
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Pushpinder Verma, Advocate vice counsel for respondent No.1.
Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate for respondents No. 18 to 22.
Appellant is reported to have expired. Since no-
one has turned up, irrespective of actual date hearing notice issued to the deceased appellant on the previous date and as the notice has been received back with the report that he has expired, therefore, this appeal is abated and the same is accordingly dismissed.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary) Judge
June 14, 2017 (naveen)
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court