This is an oral order disposing of an execution petition by issuing notice to respondents to comply with a 2011 judgment within six weeks upon waiver of notice by the state.
Direction to respondents to comply with the judgment dated 12.5.2011 in CWP(T) No.11610 of 2008 within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.1/2017
Date of Decision: 14.03.2017
Dhani Ram
………Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…..Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge .
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Romesh Verma and Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (oral)
Issue notice. Mr. J.K. Verma, learned
Deputy Advocate General, waives notice on behalf of the respondents -State.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
already complied with and report compliance before the Registrar (Judicial), in default, show cause.
respondents and also furnish the copy of the same to the learned Advocate General.
Copy Dasti.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) March 14, 2017 (KS) Judge.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhani Ram
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
