Disposed
Prithvi Chand v. State
Himachal Pradesh HCEX.P./8/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.8/2017
Date of Decision: 14.03.2017
Prithvi Chand
………Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge .
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Romesh Verma and Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (oral)
Issue notice. Mr. J.K. Verma, learned
Deputy Advocate General, waives notice on behalf of the respondents -State.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
complied with and report compliance before the Registrar (Judicial), in default, show cause.
Copy Dasti.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) March 14, 2017 (KS) Judge.
Prithvi Chand
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court