The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of an execution petition as having become infructuous because a communication in favour of the petitioner had been issued by the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
| Execution Pet. No.:60 of 2017 . Decided on: 03.07.2017 . |
|---|
| Suresh Kumar .…Petitioner. Versus |
| State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approvedfor reporting?1 |
| For the petitioner : Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate. |
| For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan and Mr. Romesh Verma, Addl. Advocate Generals. |
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Ms. Soma Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioner places on record communication dated 17th June, 2017, annexing therewith order passed by the competent authority in favour of the petitioner. As such, she submits that the present petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
of as having become infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
July 03, 2017. (narender)
Suresh Kumar
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
