Shyam Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of the petition noting that a previous order passed by the State rendered no further order necessary, albeit preserving the petitioner’s right to challenge it later.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.40 of 2017
Date of decision: 19.06.2017
Shyam Lal ..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner:
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr.V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shyam Lal
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- EX.P./40/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court