The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the court with liberty to file a fresh petition and assail the 2009 Recognition Regulations. The parties shall bear their own costs.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; parties to bear own costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.7476 of 2012.
Date of decision: 07.11.2017.
Council for Secondary Education .….Petitioner.
Versus Union of India and others …..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr.Salil Sagar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Dheeraj K.Vashisht, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Desh Raj Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for respondent No.1. Mr.Neeraj K.Sharma, Dy. A.G., for respondent No.2. Ms.Komal Chaudhary, Advocate vice Ms.Ritta Goswami, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral).
Mr.Dheeraj K.Vashisht, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition and file the same afresh on the same cause of action and further be permitted to assail the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education (Recognition of Examinations of other Universities, Boards and Bodies) Regulations, 2009.
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan), 7th November, 2017. Judge. (krt )
Council for Secondary Education
Union of India
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
