On an application for condonation of delay, the court held that sufficient cause existed to permit filing of the appeal beyond the limitation period. The appeal was registered and listed for hearing.
Condonation of a 28-day delay in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 857 of 2017.
07.11.2017 Present: Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No. 857 of 2017
By medium of this application, the
applicant/appellant has sought condonation of 28 days delay which has crept up in filing of the appeal. Even though, the application is vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. The perusal of the application, more particularly, the contents of paras 2 and 3 of the application, would indicate sufficient cause which prevented the applicant/appellant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Even though, the application is duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant/appellant. Accordingly, the aforesaid delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
List this appeal alongwith RSA No.262 of 2009 on
5.12.2017.
November 7, 2017 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (GR) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal warrants condonation of limitation.
applicant/appellant
respondents
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
