State of Hp v. Tulla Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.509…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.509…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.509 of 2017
Date of decision : 25.03.2017
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
… Petitioners Versus Tulla Ram
…Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia , Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioners : Mr. Romesh Verma, Mr. Anup Rattan, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G.
For the Respondents : Nemo.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (Oral)
Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Additional
Advocate General seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, including filing application for review of the
impugned order before the appropriate authority. Permission granted. Liberty reserved. Petition stands
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
…2…
disposed of as withdrawn, so also, pending
application(s), if any.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
March 25, 2017 (KS)
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia), Judge.
State of Himachal Pradesh
Tulla Ram
Sanjay Karol
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court