Disposed
Sushil Kumar v. Union of India
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/465/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in CWP No.465/2017 01.08.2018 Present: Mr.…
What the court decided
AI extract
in CWP No.465/2017 01.08.2018 Present: Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.3038/2018 in CWP No.465/2017
01.08.2018 Present:
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate for the applicant/ petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Sharma, ASGI for the Union of India.
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 7.
We are of the considered view that the Director General Defence Estates (respondent No.2), has already decided the petitioner’s representation vide order dated 24.7.2018. As such, no other and further orders are required to be passed, save and except that it shall be open for the applicant to independently assail the said order, in accordance with law. As such, application stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.
(Sandeep Sharma), August 1, 2018 (K S) Judge.
The Applicant
Union of India
Director General Defence Estates
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court