The Court issued a direction to the respondents/competent authority to expedite the decision on the petitioner's pending representation dated 8.02.2017.
Direction to respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 8.02.2017 alongwith Annexures P-2 within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.1863 of 2017 Date of Decision: 21.08.2017 ____ M/s Vijay Pump Industry …..Petitioner. Versus Engineer-in-Chief & other gineer-in-Chief & other ineer-in-Chief & other ...Respondents.
Engineer-in-Chief & other gineer-in-Chief & other ineer-in-Chief & other Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K.Verma and Mr. Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generasl.
Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)
It is seen that petitioner has made a representation dated 8.02.2017 (Annexure P-3) alongwith Annexure P-2 to the respondents, bringing out his grievances, which is still pending before the authority concerned.
…2…
Copy dasti.
( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice
21st August, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), ( shankar) Judge.
M/s Vijay Pump Industry
Engineer-in-Chief & others
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
