The Single Bench, orphans the petitioner and refers back to the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal to decide the application expeditiously. Petition disposed off and pending applications dismissed ordered accordingly.
Petitioner's application to be decided expeditiously by the State Administrative Tribunal. Petition and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1657 of 2017
Date of decision: 20th July, 2017 Hans Raj ..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ..Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1 :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kaundal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________________ Per Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
The only best way, this petition can be disposed of, at
this stage, is that we request the learned H.P. State Administrative Tribunal to consider and decide the petitioner’s application expeditiously. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of, so
also the pending applications, if any.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
( Sandeep Sharma ) 20th July, 2017(K) Judge
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
Hans Raj
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
