Petitioner sought to withdraw a dismissed criminal petition with liberty to file afresh. Court granted withdrawal and disposed of pending petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 846 of 2017 Decided on: 31.07.2017
_______________________________________________________________ Sandeep Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ……Respondent ______________________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
| Vers State of Himachal Pradesh ____________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Cha 1 Whether approved for rep |
…..P us ……Re _______________________ nder Bhusan Barowalia, orting? No. |
etitioner spondent ____________ Judge. |
|---|---|---|
| ___________________________ For the petitioner: |
______________________ Mr. Mukul Sood, Advo |
___________ cate. |
| For the respondent: | Mr. Virender K. Verm with Mr. Pushpinder AG. ASI, Anirudh, PS District Kangra, H.P. |
a, Addl. AG Jaswal, Dy. Bhawarna, |
| Chander Bhusan Barowalia, | Judge(oral) |
Police report stands filed. When the matter was being argued, learned Additional Advocate General states that as per instructions received from the Investigating Officer, challan has been presented in this case.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
shall stand(s) disposed of.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
31st July, 2017
(raman)
Sandeep Kumar
State of Himachal Pradesh
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
