Petitioner requested dismissal of the petition as withdrawn by him, with liberty to file afresh in a competent court whenever required. The court granted the request and disposed of the matter.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach a competent court as required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 818 of 2017 Decided on: 11.07.2017
_______________________________________________________________ Randhir Katoch
| …..Petitioner | |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| h | ……Respondent |
State of Himachal Pradesh
___________________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. AG with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer. ASI, Mohan Singh, PS Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
Police report stands filed. When the case was being heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated at the Bar that he do not want to press the present petition at this moment and he may be allowed to withdraw the same, with liberty to file afresh, in a competent Court of law, as and when required.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 11th July, 2017
(raman)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Randhir Katoch
State of Himachal Pradesh
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
