State of Hp v. Sita Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court admitted and took up Criminal Appeal No. 767 of 2016. The appellate court directed the respondent-accused to furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety to appear before the court if the appeal is favored.
What did the court decide?
Respondent directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety within six weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr. MP(M) No. 767 of 2016
19.07.2017
Present: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. AG with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the applicantappellant.
Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the respondentaccused.
Cr.MP(M) No. 767 of 2016
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has an arguable case and there are certain points involved in the appeal which needs consideration. In view of this, the present application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of.
- Cr. Appeal No.
Admit.
Appeal be registered.
Notice. Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, appears
and waives notice on behalf of the respondent-accused. Let copy of grounds of appeal be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent during the course of the day.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent-accused
Coram
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRMPM/767/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court