Nirmala Devi v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MP(M)…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MP(M)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 919 of 2017 Decided on: 18.07.2017
| _______________________________________________________________ Nirmala Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ……Respondent |
|---|
| _______________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. |
| Vers State of Himachal Pradesh ____________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Cha 1 Whether approved for rep |
…..Petitioner us ……Respondent ___________________________________ nder Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. orting? No. |
|---|---|
| ___________________________ For the petitioner: |
_________________________________ Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate. |
| For the respondent: | Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. AG with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer. ASI, Keshav Pargi, PS Arki, District Solan, H.P. |
| Chander Bhusan Barowalia, | Judge(oral) |
When the matter was being argued, learned Deputy Advocate General states that as per instructions received from the Investigating Officer, challan has been presented in this case and charges have already been framed and the case is now fixed for the prosecution’s evidence on 1st August, 2017.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
liberty to approach the competent Court of law, as and when
required.
shall stand(s) disposed of.s
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
18th July, 2017
(raman)
Nirmala Devi
State of Himachal Pradesh
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court