The High Court, Shimla disposed of the quo warranto/petition after directing the trial court to continue pending injunction applications. It restrained respondents from construction or altering the disputed property.
Petition disposed; direction issued to respondents not to carry on construction or change the nature of the disputed property.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CR No. 86 of 2017. Decided on: 22.6.2017.
Saroop Chand ……Petitioner.
Versus
Parshotam Lal & ors. …….Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 .
For the petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J.
Sh. Bansi Lal, respondent No. 4 is present in person. Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, learned counsel representing him on instructions submits that right from the day when the Commission appointed by this Court conducted the spot inspection and asked the said respondent to stop the work, no work is in progress on the spot.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Before parting, there shall, however, be a direction to the respondents, including respondent No. 4 Bansi Lal, not to carry on any construction on the spot or otherwise change the nature of the property in dispute in any manner, whatsoever.
June 22, 2017, ( Dharam Chand Chaudhary ), (karan) Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued restraining respondents from construction or changing the nature of the disputed property during pending trial court applications.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Saroop Chand
Parshotam Lal & ors.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
