Sanjay Kumar Vs A.P.J. Prasad

For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma & Mr. Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generals.

¶11

Mr. B.L. Vinta, Director of Higher Education present.

¶12

Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)

¶13

Mr. Kush Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate

¶14

General, states that consideration order, pursuant to directions issued by this Court, stands passed.

¶15

As such, we find the respondents to have complied with the directions issued by the Court in CWP No. 1925 of 2015 titled as “Sanjay Kumar and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.” Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to independently assail the

¶16

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶17

…2…

¶18

order in appropriate proceedings, if need so arises. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶19

( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice

¶20

13^th September, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), Manjit Judge.

Sanjay Kumar v. A.P.J. Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar v. A.P.J. Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Super Max Personal Care Private Limited Vs State of Hp and Others

Gillette India Limited Vs Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner

Procter and Gamble Home Products Limited Vs Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner

Vinay Kumar Vs Union of India and Others

Rajender Kumar Vs Union of India and Others

Jagat Ram Rana Vs Hp Horticulture Products