Disposed
Gillette India Limited v. Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/549/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 549 of 2017
Date of Decision: September 7, 2017
Gillette India Limited …Petitioner. Versus Assistant Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Revenue District BBN Baddi & others …Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Chandernarayan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with M/s Romesh Verma, Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General & J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the State.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.
Under instructions, learned counsel, for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, reserving liberty to file afresh on the same and subsequent cause of action, detailing the factual matrix in the petition. Learned counsel states that needful shall positively be done, if so required and desired, within a period of four weeks from today. Permission granted.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
In view of the above, present petition stands
disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.
September 7, 2017
(Purohit)
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge.
Gillette India Limited
Assistant Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Revenue District BBN Baddi
others
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court