OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 132 of…
Notice of contempt discharged
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 132 of 2017
Date of decision: 2nd August, 2017
Anoop Sharma Petitioner Versus Tarun Shredhar and others Respondents __________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting1 :
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Shri Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General. __________________________________________________ Per Sanjay Karol , A.C.J. (Oral) Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Additional Advocate General, states that directions contained in the judgment, dated 2nd January, 2015, passed by this Court in CWP No. 8072 of 2014, titled as Anoop Sharma Vs. State of H.P. and others, qua village Kanlog already stands implemented and qua village
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
2
Kahan, needful shall be positively done on or before 31st
December, 2017.
petitioner does not press the present petition, with liberty to file
afresh, if need so arises. The petition stands disposed of, with
liberty, as prayed for. We clarify that we also discharge the
notice of contempt.
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
2nd August, 2017(K) ( Sandeep Sharma ), Judge
Anoop Sharma
Tarun Shredhar
Others
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
