Petition disposed of on implementation of earlier directions; liberty granted to agitate surviving issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 112 of 2017
Date of decision: 30th August, 2017 Deewakar Singh ..Petitioner Versus Narinder Singh Josan ..Respondent ________________________________________________________ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1 :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Kunal Verma, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent states that the directions contained in the judgment dated 27.5.2016, passed in CWP No. 6408 of 2010, titled Managing Director, M/s Nipso Polyfabricks Ltd. Vs. Deewakar Singh stands implemented. Accordingly, we dispose of the present petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to agitate the surviving issue, if any, in accordance with law.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice ( Sandeep Sharma ) 30th August, 2017(K) Judge
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
Deewakar Singh
Narinder Singh Josan
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
