Dismissed
Munish Kumar v. Mathru Devi
Himachal Pradesh HCCMP/8984/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
8984 of 2017 In FAO No. 322 of 2010.…
What the court decided
AI extract
8984 of 2017 In FAO No. 322 of 2010.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No. 8984 of 2017
In
FAO No. 322 of 2010.
15.11.2017 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
CMP No. 8984 of 2017
Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, learned counsel for the applicants/respondents states that since deceased Sohan Singh died leaving behind four legal representatives, the amount in question be apportioned equally. His statement is taken on record. Let amount of `25,000/- be released
equally in favour of the claimants alongwith uptodate proportionate interest by remitting the same to their respective bank accounts as mentioned in para-2 of the application. Application stands disposed of.
November 15, 2017 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (GR) Judge
Applicants/Respondents (Legal Representatives of Sohan Singh)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court