State of Hp v. Jaid Rath
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2017 10.08.2017 Present: Mr. Shrawan…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 680 of 2017
10.08.2017 Present:
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the State.
Mr. N.K. Tomar, counsel for the respondent.
CMP(M) No. 680 of 2017
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed and the delay of one year, ten months and twenty six days’ days in filing the appeal, which in our considered view has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Appeal be registered. Application stands disposed of.
Admit . Issue post admission notice. Mr. N.K. Tomar,
Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
Pleadings be completed. List in due course.
CMP No. _______ of 2017 No interim order at this stage. Application stands
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/680/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court