Yugal Kishore Marwaha v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the petition regarding posting/stationing after recording observations. The petitioner was permitted to seek further remedies if required and desired.
The High Court dismissed the petition regarding posting/stationing after recording observations. The petitioner was permitted to seek further remedies if required and desired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1696 of 2017 Decided on: August 9, 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Yugul Kishore Marwaha …………….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……….Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
| ------------------------------ For the petitioner |
---------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents | Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan and Mr. Romesh |
| Verma, Additional Advocate Generals | |
| ------------------------------ Sanjay Karol, Acting Ch |
and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------- ief Justice (oral): |
Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner had approached the authorities and indicated stations of his choice (3 Nos.), where, perhaps, he could be adjusted in terms of the Policy. Placement/posting of an employee is the prerogative of the Executive, which, of course, is to be exercised within the four corners of law, more so, Policy framed in this regard.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? .
2
reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies, if
so required and desired, in accordance with law.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
August 9, 2017
(vikrant)
Yugul Kishore Marwaha
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court