The single-judge Bench held that the applicant's delay of 1 year and 4 months in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained and thus condoned. The application for condonation of delay is disposed of, and the appeal is admitted.
Delay of 1 year and 4 months is condoned; appeal is registered/admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No.279/2016
01.04.2016 Present:
Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel for the applicant/appellant.
CMP(M) No.279/2016
For the reasons set out in the application, delay of 1 year and four months in filing the appeal, which in my considered view, has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered.
FAO No._______/2016 Admit.
April 1, 2016 (K S) (Sanjay Karol), J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of one year and four months in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained to be condoned.
Applicant/Appellant
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
